Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of clinical studies focused on the relationship between hypertension and migraine

From: Arterial hypertension in the chronic evolution of migraine: bystander or risk factor? An overview

Author, year

Study design

Aims

Sample size

Population

Identified risk factors (OR)

Limitations

Bigal, 2002 [84]

Randomized case–control design

To identify risk factors for CM evolution

791

CM – MOH

CM

EM

cPTH

HT prevalence higher in CM compared to EM and cPTH

CM vs EM OR 6.9 (95% CI 3.1—15.9)

CM vs cPTH OR 5.1 (95% CI 2.7 – 11.1)

 

Bigal, 2010 [78]

Cross-sectional

To profile CV risk in migraine and ascertain CV events in migraine vs controls

6 102 migraineurs 5 243 controls

MwA

MA

HC

Migraineurs have higher risk of developing HT

OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.3–1.6)

• Self-reported data

• No collection of concomitant CV risk factors

• Cross-sectional

Buse, 2010 [79]

Cross-sectional

To assess differences in comorbidities between CM and EM

24 000

CM

EM

HT prevalence higher in CM

1.23 (95% CI 1.03–1.47)

• Self-reported data

• Cross-sectional

Gipponi, 2010 [87]

Cross-sectional

To identify risk factors for CM evolution

1 483

EM

CM—MOH

cTTH

HT prevalence higher in CM

CM 16.2% vs EM 7.3% and vs cTTH 6.6%, p < 0.01

• Cross-sectional

Manzoni, 2012 [88]

Retrospective (10-year follow up)

To evaluate risk factor for CM evolution

315

MwA → MwA

MwA → CM

HT prevalence higher in pts with evolution to CM

38.7% vs 17.9%, p < 0.01

• Retrospective

• Mostly women

• Small sample size

Entonen, 2014 [77]

Prospective (5-year follow-up)

To identify association between migraine and HT evolution

13 454

Random sample of Finnish population

Higher risk of developing HT in migraine pts OR 1.4 (95% CI 12–1.7)

• Self-reported data

• No evaluation of concomitant CV risk factors

Fagernæs, 2015 [89]

Prospective (11-year follow up)

To evaluate association between migraine and HT

13 852

Random sample of the Nord-Trondelag County

Inverse correlation between HT and migraine development 

Per 10 mmHg increase in Systolic BP: OR 0.8 (95% CI 0.8–0.9); Diastolic BP: OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.8–1.2)

• Self-reported data

• No data on medications

• Selection bias (low % of pts who completed the final questionnaires)

Gardener, 2016 [81]

Cross-sectional

To investigate association between migraine and HT

1 338

Random sample of the Northern Manhattan community

HT higher prevalence in migraine OR 1.76 (95% CI 1.2—2.5)

• Self-reported data

• Cross-sectional design

Rist, 2018 [83]

To evaluate association between migraine and incident HT

To evaluate risk of incident HT in migraine

29 040 (all women)

MA

MwA

HC

Higher risk of developing HT in women with migraine

MA RR 1.09 (95% CI 1.0 -1.2)

MwA RR 1.21 (95% CI 1.1 -1.3)

• Self-reported data

• Observation bias

• women only

Buse, 2020 [80]

Cross-sectional

Better understanding of migraine comorbidities

92 586

Migraine

HC

Higher prevalence of HT in migraine

15–20 days OR 1.52 (1.3, 1.8), > 21 days OR 1.37 (1.1, 1.7); reference 1–4 days

• Self-reported data

• Cross-sectional

• Selection bias

Cotta Ramusino, 2022 [90]

Cross-sectional

To investigate HT contribution to CM evolution

48

CM

EM

HC

Altered brain vessel wall reactivity in CM and HT pts. Greater decrease in cerebral blood flow velocity in EM pts with associated HT p = 0.037

• Cross-sectional

• Ongoing treatments

Faubion, 2023 [82]

Cross-sectional

To assess association between migraine and hypertension

5 708 (all women)

Random sample on data registry

Higher prevalence of HT in migraine aOR 1.31 (95% CI 1.1 – 1.6)

• Self-reported data

• Cross-sectional

• women only

  1. Abbreviations: BP blood pressure, CI confidence interval, CM chronic migraine, cPTH chronic post-traumatic headache, cTTH chronic tension type headache, HC healthy controls, HT hypertension, MwA migraine without aura, MA migraine with aura, OR odds ratio, pts patients, RR relative risk