Development and validation of non-invasive prediction models for migraine in Chinese adults

Duan, Shaojie; Xia, Hui; Zheng, Tao; Li, Guanglu; Ren, Zhiying; Ding, Wenyan; Wang, Ziyao; Liu, Zunjing

doi:10.1186/s10194-023-01675-1

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Table 5 Subgroup analysis of prediction performance of various models in training set

From: Development and validation of non-invasive prediction models for migraine in Chinese adults

Subgroup	Model	N	AUC(95%CI)	Sensitivity	Specificity	Youden index	Cut off value
Gender
Male	Model1	27	0.80(0.63–0.97)	0.647	0.800	0.447	0.744
	Model2	27	0.80(0.63–0.97)	0.765	0.800	0.565	0.507
	Model3	27	0.85(0.70–0.99)	0.882	0.800	0.682	0.512
	Model4	27	0.91(0.78–1.00)	1	0.800	0.800	0.365
	Model5	27	0.91(0.78–1.00)	1	0.700	0.700	0.412
	Model6	27	0.92(0.80–1.00)^a	1	0.800	0.800	0.333
	Model7	27	0.94(0.84–1.00)^abc	1	0.800	0.800	0.377
	Model8	27	0.95(0.87–1.00)^abc	0.765	1	0.765	0.793
Female	Model1	161	0.83(0.77–0.90)	0.838	0.700	0.538	0.621
	Model2	161	0.86(0.81–0.92)	0.802	0.840	0.642	0.640
	Model3	161	0.88(0.83–0.93)^a	0.811	0.820	0.631	0.653
	Model4	161	0.88(0.83–0.93)^a	0.883	0.760	0.643	0.584
	Model5	161	0.89(0.84–0.94)^a	0.829	0.840	0.669	0.698
	Model6	161	0.90(0.86–0.95)^ab	0.721	0.960	0.681	0.830
	Model7	161	0.91(0.86–0.95)^ab	0.775	0.900	0.675	0.762
	Model8	161	0.92(0.88–0.96)^abcd	0.928	0.800	0.728	0.494
Age
> 35 years	Model1	89	0.85(0.76–0.93)	0.652	0.870	0.521	0.837
	Model2	89	0.89(0.82–0.96)	0.818	0.870	0.688	0.731
	Model3	89	0.90(0.84–0.96)	0.712	1	0.712	0.852
	Model4	89	0.92(0.86–0.98)^a	0.955	0.739	0.694	0.569
	Model5	89	0.91(0.84–0.97)	0.773	0.913	0.686	0.808
	Model6	89	0.93(0.87–0.99)^a	0.788	0.957	0.744	0.841
	Model7	89	0.93(0.87–0.99)^a	0.879	0.913	0.792	0.780
	Model8	89	0.95(0.91–1.00)^a	0.848	0.957	0.805	0.815
≤ 35 years	Model1	99	0.81(0.72–0.90)	0.742	0.730	0.472	0.621
	Model2	99	0.83(0.75–0.91)	0.694	0.865	0.558	0.640
	Model3	99	0.85(0.77–0.93)	0.855	0.730	0.585	0.512
	Model4	99	0.84(0.77–0.92)	0.774	0.784	0.558	0.571
	Model5	99	0.88(0.82–0.95)^ab	0.790	0.865	0.655	0.622
	Model6	99	0.88(0.81–0.95)^ab	0.839	0.757	0.595	0.541
	Model7	99	0.88(0.82–0.95)^abd	0.935	0.703	0.638	0.377
	Model8	99	0.89(0.83–0.96)^abcd	0.887	0.784	0.671	0.494

^aindicated that after Delong test, the AUC was significantly better than model 1
^bindicated that after Delong test, the AUC was significantly better than model 2
^cindicated that after Delong test, the AUC was significantly better than model 3
^dindicated that after Delong test, the AUC was significantly better than model 4
AUC Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

Back to article page

ISSN: 1129-2377

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com